About OneTaste’s Legal Engagements
This article briefly describes OneTaste’s legal engagements and offers links to its publicly available court filings including exhibits.
A letter from OneTaste CEO Anjuli Ayer
Legal action is rarely the preferred remedy for disagreements. It has been with the utmost consideration that I, Anjuli Ayer, OneTaste’s CEO, have decided to bring proceedings.
I grew up in a family with Indian Hindu ancestry and so the Bhagavad Gita, the primary Hindu text, was a big part of my upbringing. Since purchasing OneTaste from Nicole Daedone in 2017, I have taken many lessons from its stories, but none have been as prescient as the story of Arjuna. A skilled warrior and prince, Arjuna finds himself in a crisis on the battlefield of Kurukshetra where he must fight against his own relatives, friends, and teachers. Overwhelmed by doubt and sorrow, he questions the morality of the war and the consequences of opposing his loved ones. Seeking guidance, he turns to his charioteer, Krishna, who helps him see his responsibilities and the importance of fulfilling his role as a warrior and protector. With Krishna’s counsel, Arjuna gains the clarity and determination to carry out his duty, understanding that he must act according to his role and responsibilities, regardless of the personal cost.
OneTaste and its associated companies and individuals have been fiercely defending themselves against all false claims made in the media and alleged by the US government. We back our defense with solid evidence, including emails, text message exchanges, and personal declarations that reveal the true facts. These arguments and evidence are available in the hyperlinks below. We will continue to publish necessary information to completely dismantle these baseless accusations and set the record straight.
-Anjuli Ayer, OneTaste CEO
Details about OneTaste’s Legal Action
OneTaste (or companies or individuals connected to OneTaste in some way) has been involved in a number of legal proceedings. Many filings have been made with the court and are a matter of public record. Here we offer a selection of the most significant publicly available filings:
Get OneTaste’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
OneTaste v Blanck, Los Angeles Superior Court (Filed November 2022, ongoing)
November 21, 2022 First Amended Complaint in OneTaste v Blanck details the history of Ayries Blanck’s enthusiastic involvement with OneTaste, the confidential settlement, and her subsequent breach of contract
Link
July 19, 2023 Transcript of hearing in which EDNY’s Motion to Intervene was denied provides the details of why the court found no reason to allow the government to halt proceedings against Ayries Blanck
Link
June 10, 2024 Joint Statement for Interim Discovery Conference in OneTaste v Blanck in which Ayries Blanck admits to destroying evidence and includes a number of relevant historical communications related to the proceedings
Link
OneTaste v Netflix, California Courts of Appeal (Original Case Filed November 2023, ongoing)
April 4, 2024 OneTaste’s Newly Acquired Evidence in Support of Opposition To Netflix, Inc.’s Anti-SLAPP Motion discusses how the journals read out loud by Autymn Blanck in Netflix’s film Orgasm Inc. contain glaring issues that call their authenticity into question
Link to filing
Unfiled documentary evidence as to the illegitimacy of the Blanck journals
Link to Expert Report examining journal revisions and authenticity (Added Nov 2024)
United States v Cherwitz and Daedone, Eastern District of New York (Unsealed June 2023, ongoing)
April 11, 2024 Letter from counsel to Nicole Daedone addressing Agent Elliot McGinnis’ perjury to justify an unlawful asset seizure which resulted in the government vacating the warrant and returning the funds
Link
Nicole Daedone, Rachel Cherwitz and Institute of OM v British Broadcasting Corporation, UK High Court (2021, ongoing)
January 2022 Decision of Justice Pepperall granting Rachel Cherwitz’ application for her defamation claim against the BBC to be proceed despite the fact that it was filed out of time. Such applications are rarely granted. Justice Pepperall’s Decision Press Release
